Critical & Creative Thinking in Research was the September 2018 topic for the Fall Focus series.
Critical and Creative Thinking
Critical thinking and creative thinking are distinctly different, but highly interconnected. Nowhere is this symbiotic relationship more apparent than in the practices inherent to research design, conduct, and dissemination.
What do these terms mean, and how can we use them to better understand our roles as researchers? While a search yields lengthy philosophical ruminations, the Oxford Living Dictionary offers a simple and concise definition of critical thinking:
The objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.
Oxford’s definition of creative thinking is:
Relating to or involving the use of the imagination or original ideas to create something.
To connect these definitions and situate them in a research context, I’ll draw on the (updated) Bloom’s Taxonomy (2000). This taxonomy lays out dimensions of thinking involved with acquiring, using, and generating knowledge. We can see that thought processes associated with analysis and evaluation, central to the Oxford definition for critical thinking, build towards the ability to create new ideas or solutions. Critical and creative sides of the thinking process are essential if we are to accomplish the goal central to scholarly research: to make an original contribution.
While presented in a linear manner in this figure, the categories interrelate in various ways, depending on the task at hand. There are times when, in the course of analyzing or evaluating a problem, we realize that we lack some important foundations so we need to read more literature and improve our understanding. We might also see an important path from the new solutions derived at the creative stage, to their application in practice. In short, as researchers we need the ability to move across these dimensions, using both critical and creative thinking at various stages.
Here is one way to consider intersections between critical and creative thinking over the course of a study:
|At this Research Stage:||Use Critical Thinking to:||Use Creative Thinking to:|
|Planning the Study||Evaluate potential research problem(s) from multiple angles.||Look beyond the typical ways research problems are identified.|
||Draw ideas from related contemporary writings, media, social media to learn from viewpoints outside of academia.|
|Designing the Study||Articulate clear, concise research questions and/or hypotheses.|
|Evaluate and select theoretical and methodological options.||
|Evaluate data needs and and select population, collection options.||
|Conducting the Study||Continue to analyze and evaluate study progress and adjust as necessary.||When collecting data from human participants, use ingenious ways to gain cooperation of gatekeepers, and to develop rapport conducive to questioning/surveying participants.|
|Making Sense of the Data||Critically analyze the data.||
|Sharing Results||Analyze and describe results in ways that will help readers understand the significance of the study.||Discover imaginative ways to present findings and reach those who can use them. Use visuals, graphics, media, links to related resources.|
|Applying the Results for Impact||Understand needs in the field, evaluate ways findings match needs, take steps to apply||Imagine new ways to use what you learned from the study.|
How would you map your own research? Do you feel your own strengths are on the critical or the creative side? What can you do to develop a more holistic set of research skills? Use the comment box to share ideas, resources, or questions. Sign into MethodSpace so you will receive new posts by email.
Anderson, L., Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D., & Airasian, P. (2000). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.