Home › Forums › Default Forum › Doubt in MANOVA output analysis in SPSS Role of S, M, N
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 years, 2 months ago by
Purna Ch.
-
AuthorPosts
-
16th February 2018 at 12:12 am #108391
Purna Ch
ParticipantSir, I am analyzing the Data in Manova in SPSS version 23. and confused about the ouput analysis. First I found different out put with change in value of S, M, N under Multivariate Tests of Significance. Also not clear about the EFFECT— Within Cells Regression and EFFECT—- Constant. I have take Big Five Factor Model of personality where OCEAN (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extrovert, Agreeableness, Neurocitism) are canonical variables in one scale and Emotional Intelligence (Self emotion appraisal, Others emotion appraisal, Understanding of emotions,Regulation of Emotions) are variates. I have taken 61 Samples for analysis (all females)
The analysis output in SPSS 23 are as follows.
EFFECT .. WITHIN CELLS Regression
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 4, M = 0, N = 25 )Test Name Value Approx. F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .81877 2.83111 20.00 220.00 .000
Hotellings 1.43471 3.62264 20.00 202.00 .000
Wilks .34746 3.25484 20.00 173.41 .000
Roys .52085* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e — Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
EFFECT .. CONSTANT
Multivariate Tests of Significance (S = 1, M = 1 1/2, N = 25 )Test Name Value Exact F Hypoth. DF Error DF Sig. of F
Pillais .75899 32.75182 5.00 52.00 .000
Hotellings 3.14921 32.75182 5.00 52.00 .000
Wilks .24101 32.75182 5.00 52.00 .000
Roys .75899
Note.. F statistics are exact.Can i be guides the difference between the above 2 output analysis pls ?
Purna Ch Pradhan
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Default Forum’ is closed to new topics and replies.