Physical therapist needing assistance

Home Forums Methodspace discussion Physical therapist needing assistance

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2172
    smortensen
    Member

    Hello all you clever statisticians! I am a physical therapist, completing a little research project about physicians use of physiotherapy.

    Statistics are not my strong point, so I am struggling a little to see if there is a statistically significance in my data. 

    I wish to determine if younger physicians are more likely to refer patients immediately to physical therapy. However, my sample size is only 8. (Only 8 responded from a total questionnaire group of 40). The age groups and groups regarding when they refer are classified as nominal data, no? So theoretically, I could do a chi-square test, but since my sample size is so small, I thought a Fisher test was appropriate?

    Anyway, here’s the data:

    H0: There is no difference between younger physicians referral tendencies to physical therapy and older physicians referral tendencies to physical therapy

     

    HA: There is a difference between younger physicians referral tendencies to physical therapy and older physicians referral tendencies to physical therapy

    I made the following contingency table:

    Referral tendencies

    Referring immediately

    Referring later

    Row total

    Younger physicians

    2

    0

    2

    Older physicians

    1

    5

    6

    Column total

    3

    5

    8

    Now, this is where I become stuck. Do I need to use the df (degree of freedom) for anything? It is always 1 in 2×2 contingency tables (says so in my Polgar and Thomas book- Introduction to research in the health sciences), but what else do I do to determine the statistical significance? Do I use Excel or SPSS? Do I need a significance level, ie p=0.05?

    I have made some calculations and have this result: The two-tailed P value equals 0.1071. The association between rows (groups) and columns (outcomes) is considered to be not statistically significant.

    I thought the fact that 100% of the younger doctors referred immediately appeared stronger than perhaps it was. Have I done anything wrong?

    I apologize for the extremely low level of this question.

    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Many thanks in advance

    S. Mortensen

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.