This month we’ve been focusing on evaluation, with the help of Mentors-in-Residence Bernadette and Steve.
Here are all of their posts, so you can catch up on any you missed!
During October SAGE MethodSpace focused on evaluation and other types of applied research. This post, originally published on LSE Impact, discusses the challenges associated with evaluating research in complex, controversial fields.Continue Reading
For October, SAGE MethodSpace will focus on evaluation and other types of applied research. Posts in the series and relevant posts from the archives will be found using this link. This post, while discussed in the context of the UK’s 2014 Research Excellence Framework, is relevant to anyone looking for ways to use testimonials […]Continue Reading
Academic evaluation regimes set up to quantify the quality of research, individual scholars, and institutions have been widely criticized for the detrimental effects they have on academic environments and on knowledge production itself. Max Fochler and Sarah de Rijcke recently called for a more exploratory, less standardized way of doing research evaluation, with the introduction of the concept of the evaluative inquiry.Continue Reading
Bernadette Wright and Steve Wallis, mentors-in-residence for SAGE MentorSpace this month, answer questions about collaborative mapping online.Continue Reading
Bernadette Wright and Steve Wallis, Mentors-in-residence for SAGE MentorSpace this month, offer four suggestions for preparing students or professionals for an evaluation.Continue Reading
Looking for a book, chapter, or video that will help you learn principles and practices of evaluation? Check out this collection on SAGE Research Methods!Continue Reading