2019 Hits: Research Ethics

What did researchers read and cite in 2019?

reab_15_2.cover_.png

SAGE MethodSpace features original posts, interviews, and resources about using, developing, teaching, or writing about research methods.  As 2019 draws to a close, we're highlighting relevant open access articles that attracted readers' attentions this year. Note that the most read and cited articles were not necessarily published in 2019.

Research Ethics is aimed at all readers and authors interested in ethical issues in the conduct of research, the regulation of research, the procedures and process of ethical review as well as broader ethical issues related to research such as scientific integrity and the end uses of research. Since 2018 all articles in Research Ethics are published open access.

Most Read

Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Haines, D. (2017). Ethical considerations in qualitative case study research recruiting participants with profound intellectual disabilities. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117711971

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Most Cited

Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720

Mckenzie, S. K., Li, C., Jenkin, G., & Collings, S. (2017). Ethical considerations in sensitive suicide research reliant on non-clinical researchers. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649996

Bülow, W., & Helgesson, G. (2018). Hostage authorship and the problem of dirty hands. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118764305

Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296

Previous
Previous

Integrity: The Most Important Research Practice

Next
Next

2019 Hits: The International Journal of Qualitative Methods